Your Brother Daniel
For more great blogs as
this one go to Daniel’s blog site at: www.Mannsword.blogspot.com
The
Question of Humanity and Utopias: The Great Divide
The way we conceive
humanity and our problems determines the nature of our solutions. Gandhi
disdained technology and thought that the return to the simple life would solve
many of our problems:
- Gandhi’s idea that technology was evil and that a
simple, natural life was morally superior came from British idealists like
John Ruskin. Sensitive people like him had become critical of England’s
Industrial Revolution because of the exploitation, oppression, and other
evils associated with its “dark satanic mills.” Mahatma Gandhi brought
this opposition to technology to India. (Vishal Mangalwadi, The Book that Made your World: How the
Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization,111)
Shakti Gawain, author of
Creative Visualizations, taught that
our problems arose from alienation from the inner self. Therefore, her answer
consisted of learning to trust the “truth” we find within:
· “When we consistently suppress and distrust our
intuitive knowingness, looking instead for external authority, validation, and
the approval of others, we give our personal power away…Every time you don’t
trust yourself and don’t follow your inner truth, you decreased your aliveness
and your body will reflect this with a loss of vitality, numbness, pain, and
eventually physical disease.”
Meanwhile, Joseph Stalin
was convinced that attaining paradise was a matter of changing the environment
– the State and its economy:
· Whatever is the mode of production of a society,
such in the main is the society itself, its ideas, and theories, its political
views and institutions. Or, to put it more crudely, whatever is man’s manner of
life, such is his manner of thought.
Similarly, The Humanist Manifesto II asserts that
“Using technology wisely” can produce the “abundant and meaningful life”:
· “Using technology wisely, we can control our
environment, conquer poverty, markedly reduce disease, extend our life-span,
significantly modify our behavior, alter the course of human evolution and
cultural development, unlock vast new powers, and provide humankind with
unparalleled opportunity for achieving an abundant and meaningful life.”
Many other utopian
schemes rely upon the removal of the repressive or capitalistic elements. The Occupy Wall Street movement seemed to
suggest that if we could simply remove the capitalist oppressors - the top one
percent – we could have a better world. Other movements placed their hopes on
the elimination of those deemed evil or less evolved.
Interestingly, all of
these “solutions” have one thing in common – a belief in the essential goodness
of humanity, or at least of their particular group, and the superficiality of
our problems. Those who believe that humanity has been corrupted by society,
also believe that humanity can be easily reformed by a radical change of society.
When we believe that our
problems are superficial, we will generate constant flow of utopian dreams.
Such dreams are usually revolutionary. They are not content to merely improve
the present system but to remove it.
When confronted with the
horrors of National Socialism, Communism, and ISIS – and various other utopian
movements, each promising to create a better world – the “believer” will insist
that these are mere aberrations, easily corrected by the right people and
re-education programs. Such hope is inevitably based upon a benign assessment
of humanity.
However, what if the
genocides, rapes, and abductions are the result of deeper problems that social
changes will not touch? What if we are not controlled by rational argumentation
or the means of production but by baser instincts?
And here is related consideration.
What if there is a human nature that requires a certain kind of care? Then we
have to ask the question: “Is this nature best served by sexual liberation?
Communism? Finding one’s own truth? Psychotropic drugs?”
This is the Mason-Dixon
Line – the great polarizing divide. It depends on our understanding of
humanity. How fluid and remedial is our nature? The progressive answers, “very
fluid and remedial.” The conservative answers very differently, and these
answers determine how readily we will pursue radical change.
The Bible testifies of
the pervasive sinfulness of humanity.
According to Jesus, we are normally addicted to darkness, the denial of
the truth (John 3:19-20). The veracity of His assessment is evident at every
turn. One Sabbath, Jesus healed a man with a “shriveled hand.” Instead of
praising God at this miraculous deed:
· The Pharisees and the teachers of the law were
furious and began to discuss with one another what they might do to Jesus.
(Luke 6:11)
This same hatred of the
Light of God is ubiquitously evident. After Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead
after four days in the grave:
· Some of [those who saw the miracle] went to the
Pharisees and told them what Jesus had done. Then the chief priests and the
Pharisees called a meeting of the Sanhedrin. “What are we accomplishing?” they
asked. “Here is this man performing many signs. If we let him go on like this,
everyone will believe in him. (John 11:46-48)
They were unwilling to
consider the implications of this great miracle. Instead, they plotted together
to kill Jesus and eliminate His unbearable Light.
Jesus even prophesied
that the enemies of the Light would not only eliminate Him but also those
associated with Him, all the while convincing themselves that they were
performing a virtuous act:
· They will put you out of the synagogue; in fact,
the time is coming when anyone who kills you will think they are offering a
service to God. (John 16:2)
According to the Bible,
human perversity is so deep-seated that it requires radical surgery. We must be
changed from above. In light of this understanding, utopianism is sheer
fantasy, like building a mansion on a cesspool.
We are that cesspool.
This is a truth that I had denied, disguised, and suppressed for years. It was
just too unsettling! However, through the assurance of my Savior’s love and
forgiveness, He granted me the courage to face the disorienting Light, and the
closer I came to it, the more I was enabled to see the ugliness within.
Fire can either consume
us or free us from our bonds. Rather than psychologically crippling me, the
Light freed me. I no longer have to hide and put on a facade. I can
non-defensively bask in the truth, knowing that my worth is unassailably buried
in His love and care.
This does not represent
a rejection of social change, but instead a recognition
of our human limitations
No comments:
Post a Comment